Consumer Reports
tested 42 samples of tuna from cans bought in and around New York and
found that white tuna usually contains far more mercury than light tuna -
and that women and children should be even more cautious about eating
the fish.
After analyzing the tests, the magazine's fish-safety experts
concluded that pregnant women should avoid eating all tuna as a
precaution. Children over 45 lbs. should stick to no more than 12.5
ounces of light tuna or 4 ounces of white tuna a week, while lighter
children should have no more than 4 ounces of light tuna or 1.5 ounces
of white tuna.
Why the stricter warnings? Every sample that Consumer Reports
tested had measurable levels of mercury, ranging from 0.018 to 0.774
parts per million (ppm). Samples of white tuna ranged from 0.217 ppm to
0.774 ppm and averaged 0.427 ppm — enough that by eating 2.5 ounces of
any of the tested samples, a woman would exceed the daily mercury intake
considered safe by the EPA.
Samples of light tuna ranged from 0.018 ppm to 0.176 ppm. That's low
on average, but about half the tested samples contained enough mercury
that eating a single can would exceed the EPA's limit for women of
child-bearing age.
Indeed, it's the outliers that pose a particular danger, not so much
the average. While light tuna especially on average doesn't contain that
much mercury, there's the danger of spikes in certain samples — and
there's no way for pregnant women to know if the canned tuna they're
eating contains unusually high levels of mercury. But the Consumer Reports study shows that it is a real threat that cautious women should take seriously.
Of course, limiting your seafood intake has its own risks. Omega-3
fatty acids — found in fish — are thought to help in developing fetal
nervous systems, and they're well-known to reduce the risk of heart
attack and stroke. The National Fisheries Institute, a trade group,
noted that none of the canned tuna it tested — even the outliers —
exceeded the FDA's allowable limit of 1 ppm or more. (That's the point
at which the FDA is allowed to pull products from the shelves, though
that's never been done.)
Of course, the FDA's safety limits on mercury have long been considered too lax
— and compared to the rest of the world, they are. It will be a long
time before we have definitive science on just how much mercury pregnant
women can be exposed to without ill effect, but most people would agree
that this is a time for the precautionary principle.
Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/12/07/consumer-reports-warns-on-mercury-in-canned-tuna/#ixzz17SG4UFbu

2 comments:
Why are we and our children advised against eating tuna because of the mercury content, yet it is fine to receive immunizations that can contain thousands of times the amount of mercury than tuna?
For example:
600 parts per million mercury = Level in a currently licensed Hepatitis B, multi-dose vaccine vial, administered at birth.
50,000 parts per million mercury = Current "preservative" level mercury in flu, meningococcal and tetanus (7 and older) vaccines.
This is an excellent point - tuna vs immunizations!
Post a Comment