New research confirms that women plagued by morning sickness in early pregnancy are less likely to miscarry.
But women who don't experience nausea and vomiting during their first
trimester shouldn't be alarmed, Dr. Ronna L. Chan of The University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, one of the study's authors, told Reuters
Health.
"Not all pregnant women who go on to have successful pregnancies
experience nausea and vomiting early on or at all," she said by e-mail.
"In addition, pregnancy symptoms can vary from one pregnancy to the
next, even for the same woman."
From 50 percent to 90 percent of women have morning sickness in early
pregnancy, Chan and her team note in the journal Human Reproduction,
and previous studies have found that women who have these symptoms are
less likely to miscarry.
To investigate the relationship in more detail, Chan and her
colleagues looked not only at the presence or absence of these symptoms,
but how long the symptoms lasted, in more than 2,400 women living in
three US cities.
"Our study had several advantages over some of the earlier studies
because we recruited pregnant women very early in their pregnancies or
when they were trying to become pregnant, so we were able to follow them
over the course of their pregnancies and collect data regarding the
timing and occurrence of nausea and vomiting early on," the researcher
explained.
Eighty-nine percent of the women had some degree of morning sickness,
while 53 percent had vomiting as well as nausea. Eleven percent of the
women miscarried before 20 weeks.
The women who had no nausea or vomiting during their first trimester
were 3.2 times as likely to miscarry as the women who did have morning
sickness, Chan and her team found.
This relationship was particularly strong for older women; women
younger than 25 who had no morning sickness were four times as likely to
miscarry compared to their peers who had nausea and vomiting, while
miscarriage risk was increased nearly 12-fold for women 35 and older
with no morning sickness.
And the longer a woman had these symptoms, the lower her miscarriage
risk, the researchers found; this association was especially strong
among older women. Women 35 and older who had morning sickness for at
least half of their pregnancy were 80 percent less likely to miscarry
than women in this age group who didn't have these symptoms.
Still, because of the nature of the study, the authors could not
prove that there was any cause-effect relationship between morning
sickness and a healthier pregnancy, just that the two were linked.
A number of theories have been put forth to explain why morning
sickness might signal a healthier pregnancy, Chan said. "Some postulate
nausea and vomiting during pregnancy is a mechanism to help improve the
quality of a pregnant woman's diet or a way to reduce or eliminate
potentially harmful substances from the mother in order to protect the
fetus," she explained.
While these ideas are "plausible," the researcher said, she thinks
the symptoms reflect a pregnant woman's sensitivity to the sharp rise in
certain hormones key for sustaining pregnancy that occurs during the
first trimester.
Source

1 comments:
I am inclined to believe the latter population. Having been pregnant 3 times, I can say as an authority on myself, that my diet doesn't necessarily improve with the onset of morning sickness. In fact, many pregnant women are only able to tolerate less healthy foods than they regularly ate before pregnancy. It would be wonderful, indeed, if our bodies police our intake. However, with all of the babies being born with fetal alcohol syndrome, it would take an insane act of determination to consume any alcohol at all in the face of the nausea and vomiting that same alcohol would promote.
Post a Comment