Thursday, July 02, 2009

C-Section Stress Could Alter Baby's Immune Cells

Babies delivered by cesarean section experience changes to the DNA of white blood cells, which might explain why they're at increased risk for immunological diseases such as diabetes and asthma later in life, Swedish researchers say.

"Delivery by C-section has been associated with increased allergy, diabetes and leukemia risks," Dr. Mikael Norman, a pediatric specialist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, said in a news release from Wiley-Blackwell publishers. "Although the underlying cause is unknown, our theory is that altered birth conditions could cause a genetic imprint in the immune cells that could play a role later in life."

Norman and his colleagues analyzed blood samples from 37 infants taken just after delivery and samples taken three to five days after birth. The blood was analyzed to assess the degree of DNA-methylation in the white blood cells, which are a key part of the immune system. In DNA-methylation, DNA is chemically modified to activate or turn off genes in response to changes in the external environment.

The 16 infants born by C-section had higher DNA-methylation rates immediately after delivery than the 21 infants born by vaginal delivery, according to the report, in the July issue of Acta Paediatrica. Three to five days after birth, both groups of infants had similar levels of DNA-methylation.

Further research is needed to determine why infants born by C-section have higher DNA-methylation rates after delivery, the researchers said.

"Animal studies have shown that negative stress around birth affects methylation of the genes, and therefore it is reasonable to believe that the differences in DNA-methylation that we found in human infants are linked to differences in birth stress," the researchers wrote.

"We know that the stress of being born is fundamentally different after planned C-section compared to normal vaginal delivery," they explained. "When babies are delivered by C-section, they are unprepared for the birth and can become more stressed after delivery than before. This is different [from] a normal vaginal delivery, where the stress gradually builds up before the actual birth, helping the baby to start breathing and quickly adapt to the new environment outside the womb."

Source

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Maternal diet affects infant's long-term bone health

Women who maintain a healthy, well-balanced diet during pregnancy have children with bigger and stronger bones than women with poorer quality diets, according to the results of a study presented Tuesday at the National Osteoporosis Society Conference in Manchester, UK.

"Our data add to evidence that environmental influences during intrauterine life alter the trajectory of skeletal development in the offspring," study presenter Dr. Zoe Cole of the University of Southampton told Reuters Health.

When the researchers assessed the diets of 198 pregnant women, two general patterns began to emerge. The first was a healthy dietary pattern filled with lots of fruits and vegetables, yogurt, whole wheat bread and breakfast cereals. The second diet pattern was less healthy and included large amounts of foods such as chips and roast potatoes, sugar, white bread, processed meat, tinned vegetables and soft drinks.

Bone assessments of the children made up to age 9 years suggested that consuming a healthy maternal diet was associated with greater bone size and density in the offspring.

"Children born to mothers with the healthiest diets, as identified by in the highest quarter of prudent diet score, during late pregnancy had an 11 percent greater whole body bone mineral content and 8 percent great whole body bone area than those born to mothers with the least healthy diet, the lowest quarter of this distribution," Cole said.

Even when mothers were grouped by smoking status, vitamin D status and social class, the differences in diet still had a significant impact on their children's bones, the researchers found. The relationship between a healthy maternal diet and healthier bones in offspring remained even after the child's height, weight, arm circumference and birth weight were considered.

"A healthy diet during pregnancy has long lasting effects on the development of the child's bones," Cole said, and this may lower their future risk of osteoporosis, a potentially disabling bone-thinning disease.

Source

Women with endometriosis need special care during pregnancy

The largest study to date of endometriosis in pregnant women has found that the condition is a major risk factor for premature birth, the 25th annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard today (Wednesday July 1). Dr. Henrik Falconer, of the Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, said that his team had found that women with endometriosis also had a higher risk of other pregnancy complications, as well as being more likely to give birth through Caesarean section. The research is published on-line in the journal Human Reproduction today*.

The researchers investigated the association between adverse pregnancy outcome, assisted reproduction technology (ART), and a previous diagnosis of endometriosis in 1,442,675 single births to Swedish women. They found 13,090 births among 8922 women diagnosed with endometriosis. Compared with women without endometriosis, they had a 1.33% greater risk of preterm birth. Women with endometriosis were also more likely to have difficulty in conceiving and need to receive ART, which is itself a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome.

"Endometriosis appears to be a risk factor for preterm birth, irrespective of ART," said Dr. Falconer. "Our findings indicate that women with endometriosis may be considered a high risk group and have special care during pregnancy."

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting up to 15% of all women of reproductive age, in which the endometrial cells that line the uterus are deposited in other areas. Symptoms of endometriosis include severe pelvic pain, heavy menstrual periods, and nausea.

In addition to an increased risk of preterm birth, the researchers also found other differences in the pregnancies of women with endometriosis. "Nearly twice as many women in this group were delivered by Caesarean section," said Dr. Falconer. "We observed that among these women the risk of induced preterm birth was higher than for spontaneous preterm birth. We believe that women with endometriosis are more frequently scheduled for preterm Caesarean section, possibly due to placental complications."

Women with endometriosis were also more likely to suffer from pre-eclampsia, a condition that develops in the second or third trimester of pregnancy and involves the development of high blood pressure and the presence of protein in the urine. Antepartal bleeding was also found to be more common among women with endometriosis, the researchers say.

"Because endometriosis is so strongly associated with infertility," said Dr. Falconer, "we were not surprised to find that women suffering from it were of higher maternal age and had fewer children. However, after adjusting for maternal age and other confounding factors, the strong association between endometriosis and risky pregnancies still remained.

"Our research provides clinicians with important information in the search for the factors associated with premature birth. Given that endometriosis is relatively common in women of childbearing age, we hope that our results will lead to pregnant women with this condition receiving extra attention, thus enabling them to have normal pregnancies and give birth to healthy babies."

Source

Cancer Survivors At Greater Risk Of Birth Complications

Survivors of childhood cancer run particular risks when pregnant and should be closely monitored, the 25th annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard on July 1. Dr. Sharon Lie Fong, of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, said that, although such women may have conceived spontaneously and considered themselves to be perfectly healthy, their deliveries should always take place in a hospital.

Dr. Lie Fong and colleagues studied data on the pregnancies of 40 women who had been treated for cancer during their childhood, the majority of them for leukaemia, but also for solid tumours. Six had had radiation treatment directly to the abdomen. The data were compared with those from a control group of more than 9,000 women who had not had cancer treatment. All data were obtained from The Netherlands Perinatal Register, a nationwide database of pregnancy outcomes. Data were matched for age at pregnancy, year and month of delivery, and the number of times the woman had given birth.

"This is the first such study on pregnancy outcome in childhood cancer survivors as compared with normal, healthy women," said Dr. Lie Fong. "Although we found no differences between most of the survivors and the control group, the women treated with abdominal radiotherapy delivered more prematurely. These women also had more postpartum haemorrhages – the loss of more than one litre of blood after delivery."

In addition to the deleterious effects of abdominal radiotherapy on reproductive function, radiotherapy to the head can also cause problems by causing the hypothalamus to reduce the production of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, both important in promoting ovulation. "We believe that it is particularly important for all female children who are treated for cancer, and their parents, to be made aware of this risk. Our research has also shown how important it is that, if they do become pregnant, childhood cancer survivors should be closely monitored throughout their pregnancy and that they are delivered in a clinical setting, rather than at home."

Source

Monday, June 29, 2009

Having a Child to Save a Life

The movie “My Sister’s Keeper” opened this weekend — a tale about a family who conceives a second daughter in order to save the life of their first.

It begins based in fact — the family uses pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, to create embryos that are each screened for their suitability as a bone marrow donor. Only those that are perfect matches are transferred back into the womb.

That first part of the story is one I know well. I wrote a magazine piece years ago about the families who seem to form the seed for this movie (and for the book, by Jodi Picoult, on which the movie is based.)

Called “The Race” my article was about two families whose children were both born with a rare blood disease called Fanconi anemia, and who both made the same desperate try for a baby — with very different results. The Nashes succeeded with the new technology — and their daughter, Molly, had a successful marrow transplant with cord blood from the placenta of her baby brother Adam (the baby himself was not touched during the procedure.) The Strongin-Goldbergs, in turn, had nine unsuccessful invitro attempts, and finally had to use marrow from an imperfectly matched unrelated donor to treat their son Henry, who was running out of time. He died of graft vs. host disease at the age of seven. (Allen Goldberg has written about Henry for Motherlode, and you can read his guest post here.)

So I know firsthand the lives that depend on this very real science. And it is why, if the movie follows the book, I worry about the part that comes next — the part that is fictional and false, that might taint how viewers come to feel about PGD.

As Picoult’s tale unfolds, increasingly intrusive sacrifices are asked of the youngest daughter. At first it is just her cord blood at birth, painless and, to my mind, completely justified. Eventually it is her kidney that is needed, and in a completely unbelievable turn of events, the parents go to court to demand this over the young girl’s objections.

One of the reasons that the Strongin-Goldberg family lost Henry was because research on PGD was stalled for a year and a half in the middle of their attempts to use it — stalled by government officials who called it stem cell research, and who feared a slippery slope, and designer babies, and parents who use their children for spare parts. Had this family not lost those 18 months of research time, their real life story might have had a different ending.

My fear is that “My Sister’s Keeper” might leave the impression that the possibility of misuse of this and similar technology is reason to object to its use entirely. There are any number of reasons that lead couples to have a child — to save a marriage, to make the grandparents happy, to perpetuate the family name, because birth control failed.

Saving a life, with a few ounces of cord blood that would otherwise be thrown away, sure sounds like a pretty good reason to me.

Source

Babies Born After Freeze-thawing Embryos Do Just As Well

Analysis of the longest running ICSI programme in the United States has found reassuring evidence that babies born from frozen embryos fertilised via ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) do just as well as those born from frozen embryos fertilised via standard IVF treatment.

The researchers also compared babies born as a result of cycles in which the women had additional hormone medication with babies born as a result of unmedicated, natural cycles, and, although they found a slightly higher rate of malformations in babies born from medicated cycles, the difference was small – 2.2% versus 0.4%.

Ms Queenie Neri, a research associate at Cornell University (New York, USA) and a member of the team headed by Professor Gianpiero Palermo who pioneered ICSI in 1992, told the 25th annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Amsterdam today (Monday) that she and her colleagues had looked at all births from frozen embryos, conceived via ICSI or IVF, between 1993 and 2007.

Ms Neri identified 720 IVF and 1231 ICSI frozen embryo transfers. The survival rate of the frozen embryos was 74% after IVF and 77.2% after ICSI. The clinical pregnancy rate was 42.8% after IVF and 39.4% after ICSI. These resulted in 84.1% IVF and 89.7% ICSI deliveries. There were 27.8% multiple IVF pregnancies and 21.1% multiple ICSI pregnancies. Outcomes at the time of birth for Apgar scores, gestational ages, birth weights and congenital malformations were similar for both IVF and ICSI singleton babies.

When she grouped the babies according to whether they came from medicated or unmedicated cycles, she found that the clinical pregnancy rate was 42.1% and 39.4% respectively; delivery rates were 86.7% (with 28.7% multiple births) and 87.5% (19.2% multiple births) respectively. Gestational ages and birth weights were similar between the two groups, but the malformation rate was 2.2% from the medicated cycles and 0.4% from the natural cycles.

Ms Neri said: “Freezing embryos as part of fertility treatment has become a fundamental part of assisted reproduction technology. We found no differences in the ability of embryo generated by IVF or ICSI to implant, even after undergoing the stress of cryopreservation. We were unable to confirm a significant benefit of the unmedicated cycle on the neonatal outcome of the cryopreserved embryos; the difference in malformation rates was small.

“The original premise of the study was to identify a difference in neonatal outcome while in the presence or absence of infertility medication, with the assumption that the unmedicated cycles would generate better offspring outcomes. Interestingly, we did not see any clear difference in neonatal outcomes between the medicated and unmedicated groups. From our study, the combination of exposure to cryopreservation and medications or both did not significantly impair offspring outcome.”

The malformations ranged from heart defects to defects caused by hereditary factors and sporadic genetic mutations or interactions. However, Ms Neri said: “They were within the spectrum of malformations observed in newborns in the general population.”

“When you think about it, the reproductive medical field has created a new sub-population. These children are now reaching puberty and their fertility status still remains to be assessed. Therefore, the continuous monitoring of children generated through artificial conception is of paramount importance,” she concluded.

Source

Abortion raises early birth risk

A history of miscarriage and abortions increases a woman's chances of giving birth too early, research has shown.

The same study revealed that premature delivery was also more likely after any complication early in the pregnancy, or in previous pregnancies.

Researchers believe the findings will help doctors identify women who might need greater care and monitoring in the months leading up to child birth.

Scientists from the UK, Denmark and Spain analysed the results of 75 investigations into early pregnancy complications conducted between 1980 and 2008.

They found that a history of one or more miscarriages nearly doubled the risk of pre-term rupture of the membrane that surrounds the baby in the womb, thereby increasing the chances of a premature delivery.

Three or more recurrent miscarriages led to a six-fold increased risk of placenta praevia - a condition caused by the placenta blocking the cervix - and almost doubled the likelihood of congenital malformations in the baby.

If a pregnancy was terminated for any reason, this heightened the risk of premature and very premature delivery in subsequent pregnancies.

The findings were presented at the 25th annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Amsterdam.

The study found that problems encountered in the first three months (trimester) of pregnancy increased the risk of complications later in the same pregnancy.

Source

Friday, June 26, 2009

Invention allows pregnant women to hold models of their unborn babies

Pregnant women are being given the chance to hold life-size models of their unborn babies, thanks to an invention that converts data from ultrasound and MRI scans.

Jorge Lopes, a Brazilian designer, uses 3-D printing technology to create the plaster models, which go on show tomorrow at an exhibition at the Royal College of Art in London.

But the invention has already attracted the attention of medical experts. “For doctors this is a fantastic development and it is absolutely unique,” said Stuart Campbell, head of obstetrics and gynaecology at King’s College London and a pioneer of the use of ultrasound diagnosis in the 1980s.

The technology is being trialled at a clinic in Rio de Janeiro. “It’s amazing to see the faces of the mothers. They can see the full scale of their baby, really understand the size of it,” said Dr Lopes.

A blind woman registered at the clinic has also volunteered to try out the technology at her next scan.

Professor Campbell is keen to use the technology as an educational tool for expectant parents and to help mothers who have difficulty bonding with their babies. It could also allow parents better to understand physical abnormalities that are diagnosed during pregnancy.

Dr Lopes, 42, first came across the 3-D printing method, known as rapid prototyping, when he was working on the reconstruction of archaeological finds such as dinosaurs and Egyptian mummies for museums. He is working at the RCA, on secondment from the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology.

Dr Lopes is now focusing on developing simple software that doctors would be able to use independently and on the spot.

Source

Earlier depressive mood linked with preterm birth

Both black and white women with symptoms of depressive mood prior to becoming pregnant have increased risk for preterm birth; but black women have twice the risk as white women, researchers report in the Journal of Women's Health.

"The black-white disparity in preterm birth may be in part a consequence of different exposures to depressive mood prior to pregnancy," Dr. Amelia R. Gavin, at the University of Washington in Seattle, told Reuters Health.

However, previous investigations of this association were inconclusive, leading Gavin and colleagues to assess links between race, preterm birth, and prepregnancy depressive mood among 555 women who were 24 years old on average when they gave birth.

The researchers used data collected from 1990 through 1996 for a larger long-term investigation of heart disease risk, in which the women had participated.

In the current study, 18.1 percent of the 249 black women gave birth prior to 37 weeks gestation. This preterm birth rate was more than twice the 8.5 percent rate seen among the 306 white women.

Prepregnancy depressive mood was also more prevalent among black versus white women - 9.4 versus 7.2 percent. Depression scale examinations conducted in 1990 to 1991, showed black women with higher depressive mood scores than white women - 13.0 versus 9.5.

Furthermore, black women's risk for preterm birth remained more than twice that of white women's risk when Gavin's team allowed for other factors associated with preterm birth, such as body weight and sociodemographic characteristics.

"Reproductive outcomes must be viewed in light of women's health over the entire life-course, as well as during pregnancy," Gavin said.

These current findings suggest "the experience of cumulative health disadvantages or 'weathering,'" may play a role in increased risk for preterm birth, Gavin notes.

She and colleagues, therefore, suggest replication of this study in a larger population of women.

Source

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Preemies, preeclampsia linked to neighborhoods with heavy air pollution

Women exposed to air pollution from freeways and congested roads are much more likely to give birth to premature babies and suffer from preeclampsia, according to a study by University of California scientists published Wednesday.

The findings, based on pregnant women in the Long Beach/Orange County region of Southern California, add to the growing evidence that car and truck exhaust can jeopardize the health of babies while they are in the womb.

Reviewing the birth records of more than 81,000 infants, researchers found that the risk of having a baby born before 30 weeks of gestation increased 128 percent for women who live near the worst traffic-generated air pollution.

In addition, preeclampsia increased 42 percent for women who lived in those areas, according to the study, published online in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives. Preeclampsia, a serious illness that involves high blood pressure, can endanger the baby and the mother.

The team of scientists from University of California, Irvine and UCLA studied babies born in Long Beach, near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and in adjacent Orange County. Those areas are traversed by several major freeways used by commuters as well as heavy-duty trucks delivering goods to and from the ports.

The infants’ birth records were matched with their addresses and then compared with traffic patterns and estimates of two pollutants—particulates and nitrogen oxides—from vehicles near the mothers’ homes.

The study was unique in that the researchers constructed a database estimating what the pregnant women breathed in their own neighborhoods--within three kilometers, or less than two miles, of their homes. Previous studies have used general air pollution measurements, which is a less accurate estimate of what people are exposed to.

Only traffic-generated emissions were included in the study, not pollutants from factories and other sources.

Other recent studies have linked air pollutants to preterm births and low birth weights. But until now, “no study has associated air pollution with preeclampsia. This is the first one,” Wu said.

In the study, 8 percent of the 81,186 babies were preterm, including 1 percent that were “very preterm,” or under 30 weeks of gestation.

The link to air pollution was strongest for the “very preterm” babies, who often weigh less than three pounds and have the greatest risk of serious health problems. The researchers compared women who lived in areas with the most traffic-related pollution with women who lived in areas with the least traffic pollution. Those in the polluted areas were 128 percent more likely to deliver “very preterm” babies.

The risk of less severe preterm babies—those born between 30 and 37 weeks--was about 30 percent higher for women living in the areas with a lot of traffic emissions.

About 3 percent of the study’s pregnant women had preeclampsia, which can result in premature babies. Its causes are unknown, although doctors think it is related to abnormal growth of the placenta.

The new study focused on “an important area of research, since there are a lot of reasons to believe that there is something happening with environmental chemicals and preeclampsia,” Woodruff said. “Women with preeclampsia have high blood pressure, and some air pollutants can increase blood pressure. This is a serious condition, and these women are at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.”

Source

Chemical Used in Plastics May Affect Newborn Size

As if expectant mothers don't have enough to worry about, new research suggests that a woman's exposure to phthalates, a chemical compound found in many plastics, may be linked to low birth weight in infants.

The report, to be published in the upcoming issue of The Journal of Pediatrics, found notable levels of the compound -- which is used to make hard plastics soft and flexible -- in the cord blood and first stools of more than 70 percent of infants included in the study. Higher levels of phthalates were found among those born with a low birth weight.

Low birth weight is a risk factor for children and the leading cause of death in those under 5 years of age. Cardiovascular and other diseases in adulthood have also been associated with low birth weight, according to information provided in a journal news release.

"The results showed that phthalate exposure was ubiquitous in these newborns, and that prenatal phthalate exposure might be an environmental risk factor for low birth weight in infants," study leader Dr. Renshan Ge, of the international Population Council, said in the news release.

Although the researchers did not find a direct link, the study adds more to the pile of evidence against phthalate exposure, which has already been associated with damage to endocrine function. Phthalates are found in many common household items, including food packaging, toys and shampoo.

The study, conducted by researchers from the International Population Council, and Fudan University and Second Military Medical University in Shanghai, looked at 201 babies and their mothers between 2005 and 2006. Eighty-eight of the newborns had low birth weight.

Source

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

ACOG Issues Guidance for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring

New guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians recommend the use of a three-category system to simplify the interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings during labor.

The guidelines, published in the July issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology, were developed by the ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins with the help of George Macones, MD, of Washington University in St. Louis.

They replace a 2005 practice bulletin and support the recommendations of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child and Health Development workshop on electronic fetal monitoring held last year.

"Our goal with the ACOG guidelines was to define existing terminology and narrow definitions and categories so that everyone is on the same page," Dr. Macones said.

FHR monitoring has been expanding since 1980, when it was used in 45% of women in labor. By 2002, it was used in 85% of deliveries.

But there has been an inconsistent use of terminology and variability in the interpretation of FHR tracings, according to the new guidelines.

In one study, four obstetricians reviewed 50 FHR tracings and agreed on only 22% of them. Two months later, the same obstetricians re-examined the tracings and changed their interpretation on 21%.

To simplify interpretation of tracings, the guideline authors recommended classifying them into three categories on the basis of baseline heart rate, decelerations, and accelerations:

  • * Category I: Normal tracings with no action required.
  • * Category II: Uncertain tracings that require continued evaluation and possible additional testing to assess fetal status.
  • * Category III: Abnormal tracings that warrant immediate attention and possible intervention. This may include maternal oxygen, changing the mother's position, discontinuing labor stimulation, or treating maternal hypertension. If the tracings do not return to normal, the fetus should be delivered.

The authors also addressed the relative efficacy of the two types of FHR monitoring -- electronic fetal monitoring and manual auscultation.

Compared with intermittent manual auscultation, electronic fetal monitoring was associated with increased rates of cesarean delivery, with cesarean delivery for abnormal FHR, acidosis, or both, and with operative vaginal delivery.

Electronic fetal monitoring reduced the risk of neonatal seizures, but not the risk of perinatal mortality or cerebral palsy.

"Given that the available data do not show a clear benefit for the use of electronic fetal monitoring over intermittent auscultation," the authors wrote, "either option is acceptable in a patient without complications."

However, they said, "the labor of women with high-risk conditions (e.g., suspected fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, and type 1 diabetes) should be monitored with continuous FHR monitoring."

Other recommendations and conclusions included:

  • * When describing uterine activity, the terms hyperstimulation and hypercontractility should be abandoned.
  • * FHR tracing should be reviewed every 30 minutes in the first stage of labor and every 15 minutes in the second stage. The intervals should be shortened in patients with complications.
  • * When the FHR tracing includes recurrent variable decelerations, consider amnioinfusion to relieve umbilical cord compression.
  • * Pulse oximetry has not been proven clinically useful in evaluating fetal status.
Source

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Vitamin B12 deficiency linked to birth defects

It's long been known that another nutrient, folic acid, lowers the risk of neural tube defects -- devastating malformations of the brain and spine, including spina bifida.

Now researchers are reporting that women who have low vitamin B12 levels shortly before and after they get pregnant are at significantly greater risk of delivering a child with a neural-tube defect.

Vegans and women who eat little or no meat, fish, eggs, milk or cheese are at the highest risk, as are women with stomach or intestinal problems, including inflammatory bowel disease, that keep them from absorbing enough B12.

The finding needs to be confirmed by more studies. But the researchers say women at risk should be tested for B12.

"Nobody should get pregnant with low vitamin B12 levels," said Dr. James Mills, a senior investigator with the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. "Women who are on diets that exclude animal products should check with their physician before they get pregnant."

It's the second time in recent years scientists have warned women about adequate vitamin B12. Researchers from St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto reported two years ago that low vitamin B12 triples the risk of neural-tube defects. It's estimated about one-third of neural tube defects in Canada may be due to B12 deficiencies.

The vitamin is important for healthy nerve cells and red blood cells. It's also needed to help make DNA.

Neural-tube defects occur early in pregnancy. The embryo forms a brain and spinal cord by essentially folding a flat portion of embryo into a tube. If that tube doesn't close completely, the result is either spina bifida, which can cause paralysis, or anencephaly, a defect of the brain and skull that is "uniformly fatal early in infancy or before," Mills said. Some affected babies are delivered stillborn. "This neural tube rolling up and closing is completed by the 28th day of pregnancy. A lot of women don't even know they're pregnant by that point," Mills said.

For their study, researchers tested blood samples collected during early pregnancy from three groups of Irish women: two groups were carrying a child with a neural-tube defect and the third group of women had already had one child born with a neural-tube defect and were at risk for another. There were 278 women in total.

The researchers measured the women's vitamin B12 and folate levels and compared them to "control" pregnant women who were not carrying a baby with a neural-tube defect.

In all three groups, women with low B12 concentrations had between a two- and threefold higher risk of having a baby with a neural-tube defect compared to women with higher levels.

Source

Judy Reyes Expecting First Child

Judy Reyes, who stars as sassy nurse Carla on Scrubs, is expecting her first child with her boyfriend, director George Valencia, her rep tells PEOPLE exclusively.

The Alma Award-winning actress, 41, who appeared on HBO’s Oz, recently starred in the Lifetime movie Little Girl Lost: The Delimar Vera Story. She also appeared in Glow Ropes: The Rise and Fall of a Bar Mitzvah Emcee, a Los Angeles Latino Film Festival award winner written and co-directed by George.

The baby is due in November.

Source

Monday, June 22, 2009

Matthew McConaughey to Play Papa Again

The ab-fab actor celebrated his first Father's Day with 11-month-old son Levi by announcing he and his partner, Brazilian model Camila Alves, are adding to their brood.

"Happy Father's Day. It's my first, and the last 11 months with Levi and Camila have been the most rewarding adventure to date. We have more blessed news to celebrate this Father's Day that makes this time next year double the fun. Levi is going to be a big brother," the 39-year-old Sahara star writes on his reggae-playing website, matthewmcconaughey.com.

"Yeah, we pulled off the greatest miracle in the world one more time. Camila and I are expecting our second child, bringing more life into the world, making more to live for. The future looks bright as the family grows, and we thank you for all the well wishes you send our way."

The bongo-loving Texan signed off with his catchphrase:

"Viva la evolucion, naturally, and in the mean times and all time, just keep livin, Matthew and Camila."

Source